Wednesday 4 June 2014
Online Assignment #3
Online Assignment #3
AT for Physical Disabilities
High Tech
Eye-tracking
Eye tracking
technology is a form of assistive technology designed for individuals with no
control, or only limited control over their hand movements. The devices are designed to follow the
movement of the eyes, or in some cases head, and allows the person to navigate
through the web or their computer system with only slight movements of the eyes
or head. This type of software allows
the person to complete any number of tasks on the computer including typing,
games (socialization) or essentially any other sort of task. The software and hardware associated with
these has improved drastically and continues to get better. A drawback is that they can be very expensive
so they are less common than the less sophisticated forms of AT, items such as
mouth sticks and head wands.
Medium Tech
Oversized
trackball mouse
A trackball mouse, and mice in general are no longer
considered to be high tech forms of assistive technology but nonetheless continue
to be very effective tools. Someone may, for example, use a trackball mouse in
conjunction with a head wand or mouth stick. It is relatively easy to
manipulate a trackball with these devices and much harder to manipulate a
standard mouse. Someone with tremors in the hands may also find this kind of
mouse more useful because once the person moves the mouse cursor to the right
location, there is less danger of accidentally moving the cursor while trying
to click on the mouse button. A person with tremors in the hands could also
manipulate the trackball mouse with a foot, if there is enough motor control in
the feet. (http://webaim.org/articles/motor/assistive#other) A challenge for this form of technology would
be its accuracy depending on the physical disablility, Something like eye tracking
would be just as effective and potentially far more accurate.
Low Tech
A low tech form of assistive technology for students with a
physical disability is pencil weights.
These weights are designed for students with fine motor or sensory
integration problems who may have issues placing enough consistent pressure on a
pencil for its effective use. While we
do often tend to look for more technological forms of assistive technology to
assist students with writing, voice recognition software, that technology is
not always available in all places. Pencil weights can be a useful backup in
the right situation.
Monday 2 June 2014
Assignment 3: Article Reviews
Article #1
Improved Lesson Planning With Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Teacher Education and Special
Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the
Susan Joan Courey, Phyllis Tappe,
Jody Siker and Pam LePage
The
authors of this article began by identifying a need amongst teachers. They found that while most schools are moving
towards an inclusive environment it is often assumed that teachers already
possess the necessary skill set to allow them to diversify their instructional
methods. They found however that many
did not and that a framework such as UDL becomes an important part of a teacher’s
tool kit in preparing and delivering diversified lessons.
An aspect
of the article that I found interesting was that during the study, particularly
the modifications part, was that teachers were able to identify and plan to use
a wide variety of means and methods to help diversify their lessons that during
the implementation section that they often returned to their traditional
methods. Forgetting or unable for
whatever reason to make use of the modifications that they had planned
for. This happens all the time when new
ideas or strategies are introduced into classrooms. Without on-going support or evaluation new
ideas are often brushed aside in place of traditional or comfortable
techniques. For real change to happen,
teachers must be provided with adequate long term support. “UDL training maintained
over time from the second to third lesson plans and students’ use of principles
increased as demonstrated by the increase in scores”.
Article #2
Making Youth Sports
Accessible to All Athletes through Coaching Based on Universal Design
for Learning.
Margaret M. Flores, Ph.D., BCBA-D Auburn University
Robbi Beyer, Ph.D. California State University at Los
Angeles
Tiffanye M. Vargas, Ph.D. California State University at
Long Beach
As a
Physical Education teacher I often find myself looking for various ways to
incorporate UDL into my planning. I have
found that while we recognize in the classroom that students learn and take in
information in a variety of ways, when it comes to sports we forget this lesson
and quickly adapt a one shape fits all mentality. The authors of this article point out that
all students, having a learning disability or not, often enter our phys.ed
classes with very different backgrounds in sport and physical activity in
general.
Part of
this article that I feel was very beneficial, and something that I will be
incorporating myself is rather than changing the game, to modify the
equipment. Anybody watching young
children play baseball has witnessed the confusion on a child’s face when told
to run to first base. The authors point
out that “bases can be physically numbered rather than simply called by name
(first, second, third, and home)”.
Another option would be using oversize equipment to enhance student’s
chances of success. I have incorporated
this into my classes, teaching baseball to the early grades I have them use a
tennis racquet rather than a bat. By
doing this I’m able to show them how to swing/stand properly while taking away
a great deal of stress in actually hitting the ball.
I
enjoyed this article and think that we must continue to look outside of our
traditional academic settings in incorporating UDL into our schools.
Article #3
Article #3
Getting it Right from
the Start: Employing the Universal Design for Learning Approach to Your
Curriculum
Lieberman, Lauren JView Profile; Lytle, Rebecca KView
Profile; Clarcq, Jason A. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance79.2 (Feb 2008): 32-39.
“Imagine a learning environment where all students are
engaged and challenged at a level that meets their learning needs; where content
is presented in multiple ways and with multiple methods; and where diversity is
celebrated and creativity encouraged.”
This quote is an excellent example of a very good
paper. The authors chose to emphasize
that UDL is not simply a framework that modifies what we do for our students
with learning disabilities. It points
out that everything we do within the UDL framework benefits everybody within
our classroom, regardless of ability, prior knowledge or disability. An example that the article uses is closed
caption television. While we primarily
think of it as a way for people with a hearing impairment to watch Tv, the
article points out its usefulness for people watching in a loud environment or
a situation where no volume is available.
This article also discusses the use of the FAMME model of
UDL. The FAMME model is based around the
use of four steps in planning UDL lessons.
The steps are, Determine the Underlying Components, Determine
the Students' Capabilities, Match Modifications to the Students' Needs, Evaluate
Modifications. While all of the steps
are important I believe one that is too often overlooked is the need to
Evaluate the modifications that were made.
It is important that we review the modifications that we make, both to
better understand success but also to make changes for the future.
Article #4
Article #4
UDL in the Middle
School Science Classroom: Can Video Games and Alternative Text Heighten Engagement
and Learning for Students With Learning Disabilities?
Matthew T. Marino, Chad M. Gotch, Maya Israel, Eleazar
Vasquez III, James D. Basham and Kathleen Becht
Learning Disability Quarterly 2014 37: 87 originally
published online 4 October 2013
With
much of our conversation in this course focused around the use of various forms
of adaptive technology in the classroom and how it is revolutionizing UDL, I
was curious as to the effects that something most if not all of my students are
currently engaged in, video gaming. I
had not considered that video games could be an aspect of UDL, despite the fact
that I am currently researching an interactive text book for my elementary
science class next year. The title caught
my attention, the article supported it.
One of the underlying principles of UDL is finding various
ways to present information to our students.
By only targeting one learning style we are ignoring the needs of the
majority of our students. The purpose of
UDL is to reach all of our students. In
considering video games as an educational tool, “These games allow repeated
practice opportunities where students can interact with alternative representations
of complex vocabulary and phenomena” essentially meeting this requirement of
UDL.
This paper studied the results of incorporating different
video games into the science classes of selected schools. The games “were Cell Command (cell anatomy
and functions); Crazy Plant Shop (genes and inheritance); You Make Me Sick!
(bacteria and viruses); and Reach for the Sun (photosynthesis and plant life cycle).” We often speak about the importance of
collaboration between teachers but often neglect its importance in our
classroom. While playing these video
games “Students expressed a clear affinity toward the video games and reported
collaborative engagement during game play”, creating a collaborative environment
within the classroom. The best way to
solidify knowledge is to teach it to someone else, something that these
students who are only ‘playing games’ were excelling at.
I enjoyed the premise of this article and hopefully along
with my interactive textbook will be able to incorporate some of these games
into my science curriculum for next year.
Article #5
Article #5
The Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning
(UDL): Engaging students in inclusive education
Katz, JenniferView Profile. Canadian Journal of
Education36.1 (2013): 153-194.
I chose
this article because I was interested in the different form of UDL that the
author was proposing. Her “Three Block
Model” was not something that I was familiar with and because of that decided
that it would be a good article for me to investigate, I was correct.
As with
all UDL frameworks, this model seeks to provide the most inclusive, user
friendly classroom possible. The author
identifies the three different blocks as “Social and Emotional Learning, Inclusive
Instructional Practice and student autonomy”. Social and Emotional learning emphasizes a
democratic style of classroom where students and teachers are involved in the
decision making process. The second
block focuses around the teachers ability to design and plan lessons and units
that develop a student’s interest and learning opportunities through inquiry
based learning. The third block, student
autonomy as it has “been shown to increase student engagement and achievement,
and develop higher order, deeper thinkers”.
I did
find the Three Block Model interesting and believe that if properly implemented
could be a very useful tool for teachers to have. It’s implementation however, according to the
author, seems to require large amounts of PD so as to instruct the teachers on
its use. Unfortunatly for many schools
and boards this may be impractical as effective PD needs to be on-going, rather
than once up for it to be effective.
Article #6
Article #6
Universal Design for
Learning and Elementary School Science: Exploring the Efficacy, Use, and
Perceptions of a Web-Based Science Notebook
Gabrielle Rappolt-Schlichtmann CAST, Inc., Wakefield,
Massachusetts, and Harvard Graduate School of Education. Samantha G. Daley,
Seoin Lim, Scott Lapinski, Kristin H. Robinson, and Mindy Johnson CAST, Inc., Wakefield,
Massachusetts
I once
again chose this article based on my changing teaching requirements for the
upcoming school year. I will be moving
into a science classroom where UDL will be a day to day practice for me, not an
occasional modification. As I intend to
use technology to its utmost, this article interested me as a possibility for
the upcoming year. The purpose of this
article was to research how the use of an interactive notebook could remove
some of the traditional barriers (reading comprehension, writing ability) from
an inclusive classroom.
The
authors of this article focused on a single example of an interactive notebook
for the purpose of their research. Their
research did indicate that “as this work demonstrates, when technology is used
to foster a supported learning environment in which the emphasis is on core
learning activities” it can prove to very effective. As I had hoped this paper did point me in the
direction of a number of different more
modern student notebooks that I may be able to incorporate. Some of these being,
Wednesday 28 May 2014
May 28 Class Reflection
The part of the class that I found the most beneficial tonight was exploring the different resources and types of systems and technology that are available for people who need Augmentative and Alternative means of communication. As a classroom teacher I have not yet been in a position where I have had a non-communicative student but statistically speaking, the likely-hood of it is increasing. I think that it is important that I have this knowledge base prior to that student walking through my door so that I am not playing catch up but can provide them with the resources that they need to be successful in my classroom. I also really enjoyed looking for the inspirational videos during our time putting together our whiteboards. I found that I spent a lot more time on this activity than maybe I had intended to but it is nice sometimes to see the positive side of things where too often we focus on the negative.
Wednesday 14 May 2014
Reading Software and Reading Websites Treasure Hunt
Reading Software and Website Treasure Hunt
·
Success for All
Provides extensive school
staff training and materials focused on cooperative learning, phonics, and a
rapid pace of instruction. Also provides tutoring to struggling children,
mostly first graders.
At the Success for All Foundation, our goal is to help all
students achieve at the highest levels—not just children who come to school
well fed, well rested, and ready to learn, but everyone, at all levels,
whatever it takes.
We believe all
students deserve an education that will challenge, inspire, and prepare them
for a better future. Our top priority is the education of disadvantaged and
at-risk students in pre-K through grade eight. We use research to design
programs and services that help schools better meet the needs of all their
students. Every child can learn. We help schools ensure that they do.
·
Direct Instruction/ Corrective Reading
A highly structured,
phonetic approach to reading instruction that emphasizes phonics, a
step-by-step instructional approach, and direct teaching of comprehension
skills, as well as extensive professional development and follow-up.
Welcome to the National Institute for Direct Instruction
The National
Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI) is the world's foremost Direct
Instruction (DI) support provider. This website provides information and
resources for administrators, teachers and parents to help them maximize
student achievement through DI
·
Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)
A technique in which
children work in pairs, taking turns as teacher and learner, to learn a
structured sequence of literacy skills, such as phonemic awareness, phonics,
sound blending, passage reading, and story retelling.
PALS is a version of classwide peer tutoring. PALS combines
proven instructional principles and practices and peer mediation so that
research-based reading and math activities are effective, feasible, and
enjoyable. Teachers identify which children require help on specific skills and
who the most appropriate children are to help other children learn those
skills. Using this information, teachers pair students in the class, so that
partners work simultaneously and productively on different activities that
address the problems they are experiencing. Pairs are changed regularly and all
students have the opportunity to be "coaches" and "players"
over a period of time as students work on a variety of skills.
·
Reading Recovery
Provides the lowest
achieving readers (lowest 20%) in first grade with supplemental tutoring in
addition to their regular reading classes.
Our Vision
We ensure that children who struggle in learning to read and
write gain the skills for a literate and productive future.
Our Mission
We achieve reading and writing success for children through
partnerships that foster:
Reading Recovery in English, Spanish, or French as an
essential intervention within a comprehensive literacy system
Teaching of children that is expert and responsive
Professional development for teachers that is specialized
and continuous
Ongoing development of knowledge and practice based on
research, data, and the theoretical framework that has underpinned Reading
Recovery since its founding
·
Targeted Reading Intervention
A one-to-one tutoring
model in which classroom teachers work individually with struggling readers in
kindergarten or first grade for 15 minutes a day. The 1-1 sessions focus on
re-reading for fluency (2 min.), word work (6 min.), and guided oral reading (7
min.).
The Targeted
Reading Intervention (TRI) is a professional development intervention designed
for elementary students who require additional reading instruction and their
classroom teachers. Via remote webcam, trained coaches with reading expertise
provide one-on-one, ongoing support to build capacity in reading instruction
with teachers.
The TRI
helps teachers build capacity by:
Learning and
using efficient instructional strategies for early reading development
Developing
skills in matching instruction to assessment
Applying
their learning for the benefit of targeted readers
Tuesday 6 May 2014
Assistive Technology Assessment Techniques: A Review
While examining the various forms and structures of assistive technology assessment we have to remember a very simple concept, that there is no one all encompassing assessment technique for anything. Research in all forms of education has shown that we must diversity our assessment techniques to meet the needs of all of our students, there is no one size fits all for anything in education. Despite the fact that all of the various forms of assessment that I examined share many similarities I don't think that a school could simply say, for example, that we follow the SETT framework and that's it. That flies in the face of everything that we have discussed and learned about designing a plan that is in the best interest of our students and their potential for learning. I think the best alternative is to maintain these techniques as frameworks, structures that allow for modification and incorporation of other strategies rather than simply adopting one as the only technique used.
In comparing the various models, its obvious that they have been built off of each other as each seems to share a number of strengths as similarities. All of the models focus on the development of plans built by a team rather than an individual and the consultations and discussions within the team. Another strength is that these teams are made up of a wide range of individuals including teachers, parents, administrators, and the students themselves. This inclusion of all stakeholders means that any plan that is developed is a shared responsibility among the team, creating ownership and accountability. Part of these plans that is also shared and essential is that the technology is appropriate for the activity that the student is participating in. An advantage that we are seeing today is that with the widespread use of handheld technology one tablet is capable of doing what in the not too distant past a wide array of various technologies would have necessitated.
The large number and variety of these structures and frameworks shows two things. One is that they are necessary and are being used in the day to day lives of our students. They have proven to be effective and beneficial to the students who are using assistive technology and in the creation of the individualized education plans of these students. The other is that we do not have one plan or technology that works for all of our students. We must continue to work towards developing and incorporating the various technologies that are becoming available for our students that will help them to succeed in our classrooms and beyond.
In comparing the various models, its obvious that they have been built off of each other as each seems to share a number of strengths as similarities. All of the models focus on the development of plans built by a team rather than an individual and the consultations and discussions within the team. Another strength is that these teams are made up of a wide range of individuals including teachers, parents, administrators, and the students themselves. This inclusion of all stakeholders means that any plan that is developed is a shared responsibility among the team, creating ownership and accountability. Part of these plans that is also shared and essential is that the technology is appropriate for the activity that the student is participating in. An advantage that we are seeing today is that with the widespread use of handheld technology one tablet is capable of doing what in the not too distant past a wide array of various technologies would have necessitated.
The large number and variety of these structures and frameworks shows two things. One is that they are necessary and are being used in the day to day lives of our students. They have proven to be effective and beneficial to the students who are using assistive technology and in the creation of the individualized education plans of these students. The other is that we do not have one plan or technology that works for all of our students. We must continue to work towards developing and incorporating the various technologies that are becoming available for our students that will help them to succeed in our classrooms and beyond.
Assistive Technology Assessment Techniques
Assistive Technology
Assessment Techniques
11. SETT Framework
- The purpose of the SETT
Framework is to aid in the creation of an individualized education plan
for the student. The framework
allows the team to focus on four specific areas, the student, the students
environment, the tasks required for participation and the assistive
technology that will enhance the students learning environment. The questions that are a part of the
SETT framework are designed to
encourage the members of the planning team to create the best possible
plan for the student.
Links:
2. Matching Person and Technology
·
The
purpose of the Matching Person and Technology (MPT) model is to take into
account the various factors that influence the accessibility of technology for
a student. In determining the
appropriate assistive technology for a student a large number of factors do
come into play, including expectations, economics and preferences for different
forms of technology.
Links:
3. Lifespace Access Profile
- “The purpose is to provide a
“client-centered, team-based collection of observations that point to next
steps in a comprehensive program utilizing technology” Target audience for
the LAP is those with severe/profound disabilities. The LAP consists of an
assessment protocol that evaluates the individual’s current abilities
across five domains: Physical Resources, Cognitive Resources, Emotional
Resources, Support Resources, and Environmental Analysis.”( www.homemods.org/resources/pages/ATAssess.shtml)
Links:
4. Human Activity Assistive
Technology
·
The
Human Activity Assistive Technology approach places its “emphasis on the
interrelationships among numerous dynamic elements, including; 1. home and
school environments, 2.the student’s personal perceptions, and 3.resources
available to the student. All of the elements guide the functional response of
the school team.”( www.slideshare.net/mjmax/assessment-models-assistive-technology)
Links:
5. Education Tech Point Framework
·
The
Education Tech Point Framework is “based on a process associated with the
delivery of vocational rehabilitation services. The developers of the model
propose that the model integrates AT into the special education service
delivery process.”(http://www.abledata.com/abledata.cfm?pageid=160377&ksectionid=160164&atlitid=178338)
Links:
Wednesday 30 April 2014
Links, Sites and other Cool Stuff
Different links, apps and sites are often passed through schools but are lost as quickly as they appear. This will be my repository so i wont forget. Twitter is a great means of finding out about new apps, technologies and research.
- f-st.co/d6Bl4b1 Lego Story Starter Program
- ti.me/1ciL3jd 25 ipad apps for kids
- ti.me/1g7rmxN helping unfocused boys succeed
- https://www.filamentgames.com/ Great science related games
Wednesday 23 April 2014
Presentation Night
Group #1:New Apps for Learning Disabilities
Group#2:Top Free Apps in Special Education
Group#3: Apps that enhance performance of individuals with extreme autism
Group#4: Learning about Apps to support students with learning disabilities; My Group :)
Group#5: Executive Function
Group#6: Exciting new apps for LD
- Using Ibooks students can use the app to recieve the information in the book in a variety of ways. Verbal, tactile, visual.
- Paperport notes:
- Book Creator: Great for using in various educational environments, levels. French, music, ELA, Math and others. Allows users to create and edit ebooks including text, graphics and audio
- I really agree with the idea that mobile devices allow freedom within the classroom. Its something that I try to take advantage of on a daily basis with my students and have seen first hand the positive effects that it can have.
Group#2:Top Free Apps in Special Education
- Really interesting, easy to follow and present information slide. www.canva.com
- Im going to be teaching science next year, science 360 looks really cool.
- I like that this group included some apps outside of the "norm". Apps for things like writing and math are very common and easy to find. An app for science and one for creating soothing sounds that can help students relax and balance themselves are great for all teachers, not just those of us teaching specific subjects.
Group#3: Apps that enhance performance of individuals with extreme autism
- Precursor Skills: I've been in classrooms where teachers put technology in front of students and assume that they either already know how to use it or will teach themselves. I like that this app introduces students step by step on how to use the technology.
- I think that some of these apps (fluid2) may be helpful for students who are not on the autism spectrum. The calming and self regulation is a skill that many children need to be taught at a young age, whether their on the spectrum or not.
- Have to find out more about app smashing?
- Really like using wordle, kids love making them for different things(social studies, ELA)
Group#4: Learning about Apps to support students with learning disabilities; My Group :)
- It was great working with my group because we all came from different schools, environments and backgrounds but we were able to find some common practices and experiences when it came to implementing mobile tech.
- We all took different apps from the webinar that we thought were going to be helpful in our individual classroom and listening to the enthusiasm towards the technology that we all share.
- I really think that its important that we take our experiences and knowledge that we gain in classes like this and take them back to our schools so we can support our fellow educators and the students in our school.
Group#5: Executive Function
- Unfamiliar with executive function, looking forward to learning more about what it is.
- Seems to be mostly about our abilities of self-management, makes sense why ADD, OCD and Autism are on the list for people who display issues with this.
- Its great that we can load an Ipad with apps that are geared towards the specific issues that these students are experiencing. A lot different than the one textbook fits all teaching and learning of the past.
- Interesting that the schools have the technology but they cannot access the schools network, seems to defeat the purpose. That's one of the problems of only having centralized tech support rather than an individual in the school that can make adjustments that would allow the devices to access the network.
- mmm cookie video, great way to end the presentation.
Group#6: Exciting new apps for LD
- The number of different learning disabilities that we have been able to discuss and focus on tonight is a testament to the abilities of these technologies and the leaps forward that we have been able to make towards helping these students succeed. I never would have thought about looking for apps to help with dyslexia.
- It becomes more obvious from every class, discussion and interaction that one of the major things missing from our implementation of technology is the lack of up front and follow up PD when it comes to implementing technology.
- I liked the breakdown of apps by price, important if your taking it to administration looking for funding or extra support.
- Prizmo looks interesting and had not been reviewed yet, im going to to have to check it out for my classroom.
- Its nice to see how the technology is allowing students to succeed on the academic side but also the huge difference it makes in their self-confidence.
- With all of these new apps and tech i'm going to have to include a day of "teaching tech" to my start of the year routine.
Wednesday 9 April 2014
Sunday 6 April 2014
Day 1
Over the course of this degree one of the things that I have grown to appreciate are the classes that give me something that I can take directly back to my school to share with my colleagues, things that we can incorporate into our daily lessons and techniques and tools that we can use to make learning easier for all of our students. While I was unfamiliar with the term Universal Design for Learning, the more that I have read, and from the discussion in class it is something that I was already familiar with. I think being able to share with the staff at my school will help us continue and expand our focus on inclusion. When we hear inclusion we often think of students with obvious special needs and designing plans and finding technologies that benefit them. I think that UDL reminds us to continue looking and working towards ways to make learning more accessible for all of our students.
I've already begun sharing the things that I have taken from this course with the other teachers in my school, including working with another teacher to use the app placemat to find an app that will help one of our students with a degenerative disease use an ipad for his writing in class. We haven't found the perfect one yet but feel were on the right track where before we were having trouble even getting started.
I've already begun sharing the things that I have taken from this course with the other teachers in my school, including working with another teacher to use the app placemat to find an app that will help one of our students with a degenerative disease use an ipad for his writing in class. We haven't found the perfect one yet but feel were on the right track where before we were having trouble even getting started.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)